Treasury activity lacks context
Wallet movements are visible on-chain, but the related proposal, approver, counterparty, purpose, entity, or accounting treatment is not documented.
DAO accounting
Decentralized governance does not remove the need for financial clarity. We help DAOs build records and reporting around treasury activity, contributor payments, grants, and multi-signature operations.
Discuss your needsWhen to call
Wallet movements are visible on-chain, but the related proposal, approver, counterparty, purpose, entity, or accounting treatment is not documented.
Payments, vesting, reimbursements, service agreements, and milestone-based grants are tracked across forums, spreadsheets, and multi-signature transactions.
Delegates, foundations, service providers, legal or tax professionals, and other stakeholders need a consistent view of balances, activity, commitments, and runway.
Potential deliverables
Depending on the available records, stakeholders, and agreed level of review, an engagement may include:
How we help
Create a source-of-truth view of wallets, signers, accounts, and operating activity.
Structure support for grants, payroll, reimbursements, and service-provider payments.
Present treasury movements and financial activity in a form governance participants can understand.
Engagement process
Identify the legal entities, governance bodies, service companies, treasury accounts, signers, contributors, assets, and reporting responsibilities.
Link material treasury movements and obligations to proposals, approvals, agreements, invoices, milestones, and other off-chain evidence.
Reconcile wallets and ledgers, investigate unexplained movement, document classification and valuation assumptions, and escalate missing support.
Deliver the agreed schedules and reporting, assign open items, and define a repeatable close and treasury-review process.
Common questions
No. A blockchain can show that a transaction occurred, but it usually does not establish the complete business purpose, governing approval, legal entity, counterparty relationship, accounting classification, or tax conclusion. Those facts require supporting records and professional judgment.
Yes, when the relevant addresses, entities, reporting periods, and source records are included in scope. The work can trace material transfers across controlled accounts and document unresolved gaps without requesting private keys or signing authority.
No. Bit Bookkeeper can use governance records as accounting evidence and coordinate with counsel, but legal structure, fiduciary duties, securities matters, and the legal validity of proposals or agreements remain outside the accounting engagement unless handled by an appropriately engaged professional.
The reporting audience, level of detail, confidentiality, approval process, and publication format should be defined by the organization. We can prepare management or governance-ready summaries based on the agreed books and evidence.
Engagement outcomes
Every engagement is scoped around the available facts, required level of review, and the decisions your organization needs to support.
Begin the conversation
Tell us where the complexity sits. We’ll help define a practical next step.
Request a consultation