The accounting stack did not scale with the product
New chains, tokens, custodians, payment rails, or legal entities were added without a consistent source inventory, transaction policy, or close owner.
Crypto companies
Accounting infrastructure for established digital asset businesses.
High transaction volume, multiple systems, and evolving product lines can overwhelm conventional finance processes. We help crypto companies create order without losing the on-chain context.
Discuss your needsWhen to call
A practical fit for moments when the records must support a decision.
On-chain balances and the general ledger disagree
Finance cannot readily explain differences among wallets, exchanges, subledgers, fiat accounts, intercompany activity, and recorded digital asset balances.
Leadership needs defensible reporting
A board meeting, financing, audit, tax handoff, or diligence request requires clearer schedules, documented assumptions, and accountable open items.
Potential deliverables
A scope built around usable work products.
Depending on the available records, stakeholders, and agreed level of review, an engagement may include:
- Entity, wallet, exchange, custodian, bank, protocol, and accounting-system inventory for the agreed reporting perimeter
- Documented data ownership, close responsibilities, review steps, and reporting calendar
- Agreed transaction-classification framework for material operating, treasury, customer, and intercompany activity
- Wallet, venue, subledger, balance-sheet, and material intercompany reconciliation schedules within scope
- Open-items register identifying missing records, unsupported balances, policy questions, responsible owners, and target dates
- Management, board, auditor, tax-provider, or diligence handoff package in the format defined by the engagement
How we help
A disciplined approach to digital asset complexity.
Operational complexity
Address activity across custodians, wallets, chains, legal entities, and revenue models.
Close discipline
Establish a repeatable cadence for reconciliations, review, and reporting.
Stakeholder readiness
Prepare management information for leadership, boards, investors, tax teams, and auditors.
Engagement process
From source records to a documented operating path.
Map the operating model
Define the entities, products, revenue flows, treasury activity, systems, stakeholders, periods, materiality, and deadlines that the accounting must support.
Establish source and control coverage
Inventory authorized data sources, trace system handoffs, and identify missing periods, undocumented accounts, manual dependencies, and unclear ownership.
Reconcile the material flows
Connect on-chain and off-chain activity to the books, investigate exceptions, retain supporting evidence, and separate resolved items from decisions requiring management or another professional.
Operationalize the close
Deliver the agreed schedules and reporting, assign recurring responsibilities, and document a close cadence that can be reviewed and improved as the business changes.
Common questions
Define the scope before the work begins.
Which crypto companies are a potential fit?
Potential clients include exchanges, protocols, infrastructure providers, payment businesses, marketplaces, miners, validators, and other organizations with material digital asset operations. Fit depends on the entities, jurisdictions, products, transaction volume, systems, deadlines, and condition of the records.
Can you work with our existing finance team and providers?
Yes. The scope can assign responsibilities among internal finance, management, software vendors, tax professionals, auditors, administrators, and legal counsel. Each provider retains responsibility for its own work and conclusions.
Do you need custody access or private keys?
No. Bit Bookkeeper does not request seed phrases, private keys, or transaction-signing authority. The engagement uses authorized records, exports, public blockchain data, and view-only access when appropriate and approved.
Can you guarantee audit readiness or a specific accounting conclusion?
No. We can organize records, prepare agreed schedules, document methods, and identify evidence gaps. Audit procedures, assurance, tax positions, legal conclusions, and final accounting judgments remain subject to the facts and the responsible qualified professionals.
Engagement outcomes
Clarity you can act on.
Every engagement is scoped around the available facts, required level of review, and the decisions your organization needs to support.
Stronger close operations
Digital asset subledgers
Multi-entity reporting
Diligence and audit support
Begin the conversation
Digital assets deserve professional accounting.
Tell us where the complexity sits. We’ll help define a practical next step.
Request a consultation