Positions do not tie across venues
Fund records span custodians, exchanges, self-custodied wallets, protocols, fiat accounts, and internal schedules that do not reconcile cleanly.
Digital asset funds
Funds need disciplined records across venues, wallets, strategies, counterparties, and service providers. We help organize the underlying activity for reporting and professional review.
Discuss your needsWhen to call
Fund records span custodians, exchanges, self-custodied wallets, protocols, fiat accounts, and internal schedules that do not reconcile cleanly.
Administrators, auditors, tax professionals, and investment teams receive inconsistent exports, undocumented adjustments, or unresolved transaction questions.
The manager needs clearer source coverage, transaction support, and open-item ownership before tax, audit, investor, or counterparty review.
Potential deliverables
Depending on the available records, stakeholders, and agreed level of review, an engagement may include:
How we help
Organize holdings and activity across custodial and self-custodied environments.
Classify transfers, trades, income, fees, and complex on-chain events.
Create better source material for administrators, tax teams, auditors, and investors.
Engagement process
Define the fund structure, strategies, service providers, reporting calendar, source systems, materiality, and intended use of the work.
Inventory authorized records across controlled accounts and surface missing periods, opening positions, inaccessible sources, and unexplained differences.
Trace material activity, compare positions and balances, retain evidence, and separate resolved items from questions requiring management or another professional.
Provide the agreed schedules, methods, assumptions, exceptions, and versioned source references to the responsible stakeholders.
Common questions
No. The service can improve underlying accounting records, reconciliations, and handoffs, but it is not presented as transfer agency, investor allocation, official NAV, custody, audit, or regulated fund-administration work unless a separate qualified provider is explicitly responsible.
Yes, when the relevant wallets, venues, protocols, entities, periods, and source records are included in scope. Bit Bookkeeper does not request private keys, seed phrases, or transaction-signing authority.
The schedules can be prepared for coordination with auditors and tax professionals, but the required format, procedures, reliance limits, deadlines, and open questions should be agreed with those providers. The engagement does not itself create an audit opinion or filing conclusion.
Potential fit depends on the strategy, legal entities, investor and regulatory obligations, transaction volume, jurisdictions, systems, service-provider model, and condition of the records. An initial scope review determines whether Bit Bookkeeper should lead, support another provider, or refer the work.
Engagement outcomes
Every engagement is scoped around the available facts, required level of review, and the decisions your organization needs to support.
Begin the conversation
Tell us where the complexity sits. We’ll help define a practical next step.
Request a consultation